The group I mention I was a part of, had to do with the study titled "Reflexology-specific guidance for using the TIDieR checklist: A Delphi study"
I particpated in this study on the panel of experts in a three-round online Delphi process. During this process a structured communication and forecasting method was used to achieve consensus on the content of the Reflexology specific guidance. This was followed by online meetings to refine the wording and agree on illustrative examples.
The primary goal of the study was to improve the completeness and transparency of reporting reflexology interventions, which historically has been a barrier to the therapy's replication, meta-analysis, and broader acceptance in evidence-based practice.
The study titled "Reflexology-specific guidance for using the TIDieR checklist: A Delphi study" developed and validated a set of comprehensive, standardized guidelines for the reporting of reflexology interventions in research publications.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876382024000854
